A coalition of industry groups asked Friday for the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to hear its challenge of federal regulations that require broadband internet providers to treat web traffic equally, arguing that a three-judge panel was "seriously wrong in approving this power grab."
- Baseball Runs Deeper Than Law in Top MLB Prospect Bregman's Family
- Sanctions Sought in Row Over CrossFit Trademark
- Fourth Circuit Strikes North Carolina Voter ID Law, Finding ‘Discriminatory Intent’
- DOJ Can't Shield Names of All Immigration Judges Who Face Complaints, DC Circuit Rules
- A Look at 30 Years of Lawyering That Helped Free John Hinckley
- FTC, Reversing In-House Judge, Rules Against LabMD in Cybersecurity Case
Airbnb Inc., citing its home-sharing platform's arbitration policy, wants a Washington federal judge to dismiss a complaint in which a consumer says he was discriminated against based on his race. Hogan Lovells represents the company in Washington federal district court.
An internal prosecution guide developed by the U.S. Department of Justice in the aftermath of the failed case against the late Sen. Ted Stevens is exempt from public records requests, a federal appeals court in Washington ruled on Tuesday.
The Federal Trade Commission has found that the now-shuttered cancer testing company LabMD failed to adequately protect the personal information of nearly 10,000 patients, reversing an in-house judge’s decision in a closely watched data security case.
A federal agency that's locked in a fight with a corporation over the interpretation of a statute might want to avoid the Ninth Circuit and head into the decidedly more "deferential" Sixth Circuit. That's according to the recent findings of a comprehensive study of the 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council.
Calls For Nomination
A California couple that ran one of the first CrossFit programs for more than a decade has asked a federal judge to sanction the fitness company and its lawyers for filing a frivolous trademark infringement suit.
In separate cases involving disputed disability claims, an appeals court has reversed an ex-Kirkland & Ellis partner’s disability suit victory, while Squire Patton Boggs stands accused of denying disability benefits to a former associate.