"From the moment Neil left, we were missing him and hoping he would return," said Kirkland's Eugene Assaf.
- Top Treasury Department Official to Join S&C in DC
- First Xarelto Case to Test Views Over Attorney Ads
- Supreme Court Asked to Umpire 'Who's on First' Dispute
- 9 Firms Drop Off DC Circuit's Pro Bono Leaders List
- What Hogan Lovells Did Right (and Wrong) in Its Founding Tie-Up
- Top 100 Verdicts 2016: Juries Return Four Billion-Dollar Awards
On a relatively quiet Sunday morning, the news exploded across social media: The U.S. Supreme Court would be dining with President Donald Trump at the White House on Thursday, according to the White House weekly outlook. By Monday morning, the dinner was off. What happened? The White House blamed scheduling conflicts.
Stuart Banner is a legal historian who has written books on the history of baseball's antitrust exemption, the struggle to control airspace and how American Indians lost their land. On Wednesday, Banner achieved a new distinction: He won his first U.S. Supreme Court argument.
A Washington federal appeals court on Friday rejected the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's attempt to investigate an embattled accreditor of for-profit colleges, upholding a trial judge’s ruling that faulted the Obama-era agency for straying outside its jurisdiction.
A team from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, representing the medical marijuana advocate Americans for Safe Access, isn't holding its breath for federal drug enforcement officials to erase their alleged misstatements about the health risks of cannabis.
There are three talc cases in the Top 100 Verdicts of 2016.
The billions are back. After a drop in 2015, which saw a top verdict of only $845 million, four verdicts in 2016 came in at more than a billion dollars each, according to the annual Top 100 Verdicts by ALM's VerdictSearch.