An unusual confluence of petitions from employers, employees and the government successfully urged the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether workplace arbitration agreements banning class actions violate federal labor laws. The justices agreed on Friday to take up the dispute.
- Tort Reformers Target Missouri Laws That They Claim Led to Gargantuan Verdicts
- Cadwalader to Close Houston Office in Core Practice Pivot
- Lessons from the Trenches: Homeland Security Advisor Lisa Monaco on Cybersecurity in National Security
- Dewey Cloud Lifted for Defendant Who Found Home at Williams & Connolly
- Supreme Court Will Choose Forum for Water-Rule Fight
- Supreme Court Takes Up Amgen-Sandoz Dispute Over Biosimilar Drugs
A Morrison & Foerster associate who recently completed a U.S. Supreme Court clerkship will argue Wednesday against former solicitor general Seth Waxman in a major race discrimination case that involves the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
The U.S. Justice Department has a duty to enforce and defend federal laws—unless the agency can't do so in a "reasonable way," U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions said Tuesday during his confirmation hearing to be U.S. attorney general.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to decide where a major challenge over an Obama administration clean-water rule should be waged—in a federal appellate court or the federal district courts. The justices agreed to hear claims from national companies, 29 states and agriculture-related groups that argued the litigation should take place in federal district courts and not in a federal appellate court.
Calls For Nomination
Missouri is now the No. 1 target of tort reformers, who this month outlined the most ambitious effort in the country at dismantling laws they claim have led to gargantuan verdicts, including a trio of double-digit awards last year against Johnson & Johnson over its baby powder.