'FCC V. FOX'

The new indecency fight

, The National Law Journal

As spectators waited for the justices to hear arguments in FCC v. Fox, there was a near fascination about who, if anyone, would utter two words. The high court was being asked to weigh in on whether broadcast TV stations should be held accountable when those words are spontaneously uttered live on the air. The spontaneous fleeting expletive seems like the morality police's last chance to get in a dig as broadcast TV's influence and viewership wanes and cable TV and the Internet continue to blossom.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com