In defense of a judge

Raising questions should be applauded.

, The National Law Journal

Dean Erwin Chemerinsky's attack on Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs of the 2d Circuit epitomizes what a lawyer should not do. Federal judges are normally inhibited from defending themselves against personal attacks because they are expected to refrain from media give and take. Thus, Chemerinsky must have known that Jacobs was effectively foreclosed from joining him in the trenches to meaningfully respond. Worse, Chemerinsky, supposedly commenting on a speech by Jacobs, totally misrepresented what Jacobs said.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at