In voter ID case, how big is the letter of the law?

, The National Law Journal


In court papers, font size matters — the smaller the font, the more information an attorney can jam into a document. In South Carolina's closely watched dispute with the Justice Department over voter identification, lawyers on both sides are duking it out over a single point size.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to LexisAdvance®.

Continue to LexisAdvance®

Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via LexisAdvance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • ColorBlindJustice

    If prejudicing the United States is it's concern, the DOJ should worry far less about South Carolina voters properly identifying themselves and far more about AG Holder's divisive and wholly irresponsible rhetoric about disenfranchisement, to say nothing of the palpably and pathetically partisan nature of all its voter ID lawsuits.

  • GaP

    One part of me want to roll my eyes and ask. For this we went to law school ? Really ? To argue over minutia such as font size ? But the other half of me concedes that as advocates our stock and trade is to find the "devil in the details." In this case why should the violator be given an unfair advantage to present its case. In the court of law for justice to prevail the playing field must be level. All parties must play by the same rules. Compromise ? NEVER.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202570758746

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.