DNA, Up for Sampling

The U.S. Supreme Court issues a major Fourth Amendment ruling.

, The National Law Journal


Police sampling of the DNA of individuals arrested in connection with serious crimes may become as routine as fingerprinting and photographing as the result of a major Fourth Amendment ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court last week.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • QJ

    It's easy to argue that a swab of the side of a person's mouth is not invasive, however, that argument seems to miss the most invasive factor--a person being forced to relinquish their genetic identification to anyone, the local police, the state or the federal government is an extreme invasion. Can you imagine being pulled over for a traffic violation and then being forced to submit your DNA? I've been stopped by an officer while walking into Walmart early one Sunday morning and was asked my name. I didn't even want to answer that (He was supposedly looking for a suspect). Suppose he would have demanded a DNA sample?! Does that seem too far fetched given this Supreme Court decision?

  • ljyoung

    A critical question is what happens to a given DNA data set when the individual from whom it originated is found to be not guilty.

  • Bernard Chanin

    Given the indisputable value of DNA in the solution of violent crimes, it is hard to accept the debasement of liberty argument. All political decisions are compromises of one sort or another. The counterargument is largely abstract given the minimal intrusion involved in obtaining the DNA sample, less intrusion in one's lives than in providing information to the state to obtain a driver's license. The value of removing violent predators off the streets trumps ideological conviction.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202602685606

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.