Clock's Ticking on ABA Pro Bono Requirement

, The National Law Journal


The American Bar Association has an opportunity to provide national leadership on law student pro bono programs.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • Stevelaudig

    Under what theory of involuntary servitude does this come? One thing the ABA could do is have a mandatory malpractice insurance drive to have supreme courts require all lawyers to either have insurance or self insure or disclose to clients that they aren't insured. that would prevent far more suffering than this 50 hours is intended to relieve.

  • legaltruth

    This requirement is absurd. There is an ever increasing decline in law school applications. This requirement would increase the uncertainty of individuals being able to qualify to practice law. Thus it will naturally lead to further decreases in application rates. As we have already seen it is the brightest students choosing not to enter law school and these would likely lead to further decimate the intellect pool.

    Don't attorneys understand even the basics of economics. Higher cost reduces a purchases. Not just price, but cost. Tuition, time, and testing or additional requirements are all costs that the law students will have to bear. If you increase any of those the number of students will fall.

    As there is a decline in those entering the profession it causes a scarcity, or under supply, in the market and prices will likely go up or remain just as high. So how is this supposed to help the access to justice problem. Indentured servitude rarely encourages one to provide further services for free.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202614134383

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.