Law Scholars Debate Legality of Syria Attack

, The National Law Journal

   | 1 Comments

With the possibility of military action against Syria looming, constitutional scholars are debating whether the president must first get approval from Congress to legally launch an attack.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • This article fails to address the International legal aspects of military intervention.

    Under the UN Charter, states may only use force in two instances: self-defence or when the Security Council has authorized force to maintain or restore international peace and security.

    Here, Syria has not attacked American citizens, assets, or allies; nor has the Security Council authorized the use of force. The Syrian government is merely engaging in an internal conflict to suppress rebels.

    Additionally, Customary International law would allow Syrian government officials, such as Assad, to be prosecuted for crimes against humanity and the use of chemical weapons, even though Syria has not become a party to the Genocide, Torture, or Ban on Chemical Weapons conventions.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202617549157

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.