Challenges to New Volcker Rule a 'Virtual Certainty'

, The National Law Journal


Michael Bleier of Reed Smith

"The statute gives lots of discretion to the agencies," he said. "It was pretty clear what Congress wanted the agencies to do. The only issue is how it's implemented."

A challenge would likely focus on whether the agencies gave stakeholders an opportunity to comment—and whether the agencies took the comments into account. 

The agencies received about 18,000 comments, although all but roughly 500 were virtually identical form letters. Some substantive comments, however, ran more than 100 pages long, he said.

Patrikis said the agencies made " many changes” including “massive rewriting” between the draft version and the final rule. As a result, questions may arise about whether stakeholders had adequate opportunity to comment, especially if the changes made the rules stricter. "I always felt that if you make a rule harsher, it should go up for comment again," he said.

Another avenue would be to challenge the agencies' cost/benefit analysis—a popular tactic in suits against the SEC and other agencies. But given the nearly 900 pages of explanation accompanying the rule, "my gut tells me that it's not too likely" such a challenge would succeed, Jones Day banking and finance partner Joel Telpner said.

Ellen Marshall, a banking, corporate and finance partner at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, said in an email that lawsuits might take time to ripen.

"Applying these rules will involve line-drawing, such as when a hedge position is considered to be related to a specific asset or liability and when it is merely part of an overall portfolio management strategy," she said. "Or when an investment, though held for longer than 60 days, is not held for investment. These sorts of line-drawing issues are likely to take years to develop."

In the short term, Marshall said, the CEO attestation requirement could prove vulnerable to a challenge. The provision, not included in the original draft, would require bank executives to personally guarantee that their institutions are in compliance with the law. She also flagged the extension of regulation to foreign banks, which could be viewed as "beyond the scope of the statute.”    

Banks have until July 2015 to comply—a one year extension. As a result, there's "no all-fired rush to go to court.” Fisher said. “I think people will wait until the compliance date is closer until they resort to judicial review."

He continued, "They'll have time to come to grips with this and consider if it requires some kind of litigation or not, or if it can be managed."

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202631813293

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.