Court: 'Brutal' Cavity Search Violated Arrestee's Rights

, The National Law Journal


The "brutal and physically invasive" removal of a package containing cocaine during a body-cavity search of a suspected drug dealer without a warrant violated his Fourth Amendment rights, a federal appeals court has ruled.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisAdvance® Here

Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisAdvance® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisAdvance® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisAdvance® services via® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Legaltech News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisAdvance® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • ColorBlindJustice

    That cops found a significant quantity of cocaine in the rectum of this jailhouse smuggler makes clear there was nothing "unreasonable" about the search. If it turned out to be "brutal," the smuggler has only himself to blame. After all, he could have just fessed up and gently extracted the packet of cocaine of his own volition. So this will ultimately be just another Ninth Circuit decision to be overturned by the SCOTUS.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202668138447

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.