UPDATED

Former Federal Appeals Chief Judges Urge Senate to Act on Supreme Court Nominee

, The National Law Journal

   | 3 Comments

Two federal appeals court chief judges—Patricia Wald and John Gibbons—are urging the U.S. Senate to act on President Obama's forthcoming U.S. Supreme Court nominee, according to a letter released on Monday by Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Robby

    Danged. I submitted a comment here w/appropriate spaces, etc. But it appeared without those. Sorry. (And no editing capability?)

  • Robby

    To get a hearing on his nominee, Obama should submit an "extraordinary petition" to the SCt for a "writ of mandamus" to make the Senate at least hold hearings on his judicial nomination. Extraordinary Writ: wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedures_of_the_Su... Writ of Mandamus: wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandamus This would force the SCt to decide if the U.S. Constitution requires the Senate to hold such hearings as part of the President‘s clearly stated, "shall" (must) Constitutional duty to nominate and appoint SCt Judges. I think there is a good chance that the SCt (esp Chief Justice Roberts) would accept such an Extraordinary Petition. Roberts, though a Republican-appointed judge, is a reasonable-minded person, and has long voiced concern over seeing the SCt become a "political institution." And, this is precisely what the Republican Senate is trying to make it, by refusing -- on purely political grounds -- to even hold hearings on Obama‘s nomination. Roberts is likely very concerned about his court -- "The Roberts Court" -- being viewed as the one that ultimately made the SCt into a mostly political entity, rather than the apolitical one it is supposed to be.

  • Alan

    I invite readers to read The Supreme Court Vacancy, The Constitution, and The State of Politics published February 18, 2016, at The Examined Life and found at alansacker.blogspot.com. With a largely dysfunctional Congress brought about by hyper-partisanship by many on the right, political ideology is trumping good governance.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202752107603

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.