How Lawyers Viewed the DOMA Arguments
Recorder sibling publication The National Law Journal asked several lawyers for a fast analysis of Wednesday's Supreme Court fight over the constitutionality of Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act of 1996, which defines marriage as between a man and woman for all federal purposes. Their reactions to the arguments follow:
Judith Schaeffer, Center for Constitutional Accountability vice president: "A majority of justices today appeared to regard DOMA for what it is: a pervasive program of discrimination that changes 1,100 laws and touches every aspect of life."
Elizabeth Wydra, CAC chief counsel: "To great applause, at least in the lawyers lounge, Justice Kagan pushed back again at the argument that DOMA is a benign federal law by citing blatantly discriminatory comments in the U.S. House reports."
This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at email@example.com