How Lawyers Viewed the DOMA Arguments
Recorder sibling publication The National Law Journal asked several lawyers for a fast analysis of Wednesday's Supreme Court fight over the constitutionality of Section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act of 1996, which defines marriage as between a man and woman for all federal purposes. Their reactions to the arguments follow:
Judith Schaeffer, Center for Constitutional Accountability vice president: "A majority of justices today appeared to regard DOMA for what it is: a pervasive program of discrimination that changes 1,100 laws and touches every aspect of life."
Elizabeth Wydra, CAC chief counsel: "To great applause, at least in the lawyers lounge, Justice Kagan pushed back again at the argument that DOMA is a benign federal law by citing blatantly discriminatory comments in the U.S. House reports."
This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.
To view this content, please continue to LexisAdvance®.
Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via LexisAdvance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at email@example.com