Justices Hunt for Intent in Bank Fraud Law

, The National Law Journal

   | 1 Comments

The harrowing robbery of Kim Kardashian in Paris, Jesse James' historical bank heists and even notorious bank robber Willie Sutton played into U.S. Supreme Court arguments on Tuesday as the justices wrestled with the level of intent needed to prove federal bank fraud.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • joanne denison

    where is the law that says that banks cannot defraud consumers with an equal sentence for banksters with unconscionable fees, fines and penalties?

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202769207152

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.