Two federal appellate panels on Tuesday issued conflicting rulings on the availability of subsidies for health insurance purchased on federally run exchanges and moved the next major battle over the Affordable Care Act closer to the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Litigation Over Fiery Bus Crash Proceeds in California
- Gift Will Bolster Maryland Law’s Environmental Program
- Second Circuit Socks Travelers With $500 Million Asbestos Tab
- Panel Rebuffs Challenge to Foie Gras Production
- Call for Nominations: Carolinas In-House Legal Department of the Year
- Call for Nominations: Washington D.C. Rising Stars
A coalition formed to urge the U.S. Supreme Court to increase transparency criticized the justices on Tuesday for not doing more to boost public access to court proceedings in the term just ended.
The Justice Department will intervene in a False Claims Act suit against Symantec Corp., which allegedly over-charged the government for hundreds of millions of dollars worth of software and related products.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Tuesday upheld IRS provisions that implement the Affordable Care Act exchanges. The ruling came two hours after the D.C. Circuit ruled against the government in a similar challenge.
A divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Tuesday dealt a severe blow to the federal Affordable Care Act by invalidating subsidies to individuals who buy health insurance through marketplaces known as federally created exchanges.
Calls for Nomination
The National Law Journal and Law.com are accepting nominations for our inaugural list of America’s Elite Trial Lawyers. For this recognition program, we are focusing on U.S.-based firms that have done exemplary and cutting-edge work on behalf of plaintiffs.
The Texas Supreme Court has dismissed a $1.2 million judgment against Petroleum Solutions Inc. over a diesel spill, finding that the trial court abused its discretion by imposing spoliation sanctions against the company when there was no proof it intentionally lost or destroyed evidence.
A Volvo subsidiary is responsible for violating a consent decree that a separate subsidiary entered into involving the Environmental Protection Agency's emission standards for new motor vehicle engines, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has ruled.