Firms report using alternatives to billable hour
Below is a listing of the law firms that provided information about the alternative billing methods that they use most often.
We asked firms to differentiate between variations on the traditional billable hour (discounted and blended hourly rates, for example) and true alternatives to the billable hour (such as fixed or flat fees, contingency fees, hybrid fees and retrospective fees based on value).
The percentages given below denote the estimated portions of the firms' revenues obtained through each of these two categories.
The percentages are followed by the billing methods that the firms reported using within the two categories. The number given after each firm's name indicates its total number of attorneys.
The firms provided the information in response to The National Law Journal's 2008 survey of the nation's 250 largest law firms. This list includes firms that were not among the NLJ 250.
This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at email@example.com