Brief of the Week: In Beer v. U.S., a fight over judicial pay

, The National Law Journal

James Madison proposed indexing judicial pay to the price of wheat or another commodity. But a commodity of stable value couldn't be found, so instead the founding fathers bestowed upon Congress the authority to raise judges' salaries. The compromise helped to create today's tension among the Compensation Clause's goal of preserving judicial pay, inflation's erosion of that pay, and Congress' control of judicial pay, according to an amicus brief challenging Congress' failure to appropriate judicial cost-of-living increases.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at