Tenure didn't protect law professor's job, Sixth Circuit rules

, The National Law Journal

   | 3 Comments

Tenure does not guarantee a job for life, a federal appeals court has declared in affirming the dismissal of a former professor's lawsuit against the Thomas M. Cooley Law School.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Darren McKinney, American Tort Reform Association, Washington, D.C.

    Come down from your ivory tower, "topteach1," and join the real world wherein all us working stiffs have to try to get along with the boss, and few if any of us has a right to attack a new colleague or refuse a reasonable work assignment. Prof. Branham apparently conducted herself at Cooley as an obnoxious prima donna, and tenure was never intended as blanket protection for such willfully disagreeable misfits.

  • topteach1

    The function of tenure, my dear McKinney, is to protect teachers from vicious political retribution/retaliation/persecution. Only someone so dedicated to destroying the tort system and its protections could post so absurdly argued a note like yours. This professor, like all professors similarly situated, is now at the mercy of his or her dean, regardless of ability, capability, and prior success. Sounds like you are in the Scott Walker "workers have no rights at all" camp. How silly is that! Btw, I have been teaching for over 30 years, the past 15 at the college/university level. Your comment about the relative cost versus the benefits of education bespeaks the attitude of a true philistine. Instead of asking for a cost-benefit analysis, you might consider the proposition that being highly educated is simply a good in and of itself and not necessarily something that it is good for. But then, that higher order of thought is probably way beyond you.

  • Darren McKinney, American Tort Reform Association, Washington, D.C.

    Prof. Branham's attitude and sense of entitlement speaks volumes about why higher education costs so much and offers so little these days. It's hard to believe St. Louis University was foolish enough to invite troubles of its own when she someday may decide she doesn't want to teach a particular course or doesn't embrace a new faculty member there.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202566478037

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.