One more task force on the legal profession's problems

, The National Law Journal

   | 1 Comments

The 18-member Task Force on the Future of Legal Education plans to spend two years examining how well law schools are meeting the needs of the profession.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Michael

    Do they really need another task force? Does anyone really think the big drop off in the amount of legal work is due to some problem with the law schools? What's happened is this: Businesses and individuals got used to the idea that legal representation cost a lot of money so they paid it, whether they wanted to or not. Since the financial down turn, they simply can't afford it so they haven't been spending the money. And guess what? They've found they don't need as much legal work and they don't need to pay big money for the work they do have done.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202566647720

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.