Privilege Covers Law Firms' Talks With Inhouse Counsel

, The National Law Journal


Two state high courts ruled this week that the attorney-client privilege means that lawyers need not open confidential talks with their in-house counsel to clients bringing malpractice claims, as a third highest court prepared to mull the same question.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

  • not available

    The Illinois appellate court addressed this issue last year and also held that the attorney-client privilege covers a law frm's communicaton with in-house and outside counsel. Peter Garvy v. Seyfarth Shaw, 2012 IL App (1st) 110115 (1st Dist. March 1, 2012)(Seyfarth attorneys' communications with in-house and outside counsel protected by attorney-client privilege for the period after conflicts disclosure letter sent). However, I do not believe the Illinois Supreme Court has ruled on the issue yet, although the Garvy case is headed back up to the appellate court again and may go to the Supreme Court. Comment by Paul E. Starkman, Pedersen & Houpt, Chicago, IL.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202610600901

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.